· 6/23/1980
Miller v. Dilda
Citations
- 447 U.S. 935
- 100 S. Ct. 3039
- 65 L. Ed. 2d 1130
- 1980 U.S. LEXIS 2442
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Rule 35’s language is self limiting and cannot be expanded to include examinations not expressly authorized therein
- “Rule 35’s language is self-limiting and cannot be expanded to include examination by non-physicians.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.