Skip to main content
· 6/23/1980

Miller v. Dilda

Citations

  • 447 U.S. 935
  • 100 S. Ct. 3039
  • 65 L. Ed. 2d 1130
  • 1980 U.S. LEXIS 2442

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Rule 35’s language is self limiting and cannot be expanded to include examinations not expressly authorized therein
  • “Rule 35’s language is self-limiting and cannot be expanded to include examination by non-physicians.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.