Miller v. Department of Navy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the court should be “unusually deferential” when reviewing the Secretary of the Navy’s denial of a request for an SSB
• directing that a district court remand a case to the agency so that it may “issue a new decision based on the correct section of the relevant regulation”
• “[Courts] are obligated to apply [§ 628(g)’s] standard in an ‘unusually deferential’ manner when reviewing personnel decisions made by the military.” (quoting Cone v. Caldera, 223 F.3d 789, 793 (D.C. Cir. 2000))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).