Miller v. Cuelho

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[b]ecause [the petitioner’s] cause of action for declaratory judgment should have been dismissed, his request for injunctive relief also should have been dismissed”
• holding that claim for injunctive relief was moot
• “The proper scope of declaratory judgment is to adjudge those rights among parties upon which their future conduct depends.” (citation and punctuation omitted; emphasis added)
• “The proper scope of declaratory judgment is to adjudge those rights among parties upon which their future conduct depends.” (emphasis supplied)
• The Declaratory Judgment Act gives superior courts the power to declare rights and other legal relations of any interested party only “in ‘cases of actual controversy’ under OCGA § 9-4-2 (a
• “[I]t is a settled principle of Georgia law that the jurisdiction of the courts is confined to justiciable controversies, and we will not decide the constitutionality of a law where no justiciable case or controversy is presented.” (citation and punctuation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).