Miller v. Crumbley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the fact that defendant “may have had a pattern of using a cell phone while driving” was “not enough standing alone to establish a policy or pattern of dangerous driving”
• punitive damages recoverable in automobile collision case alleging negligence where collision resulted from a pattern or policy of dangerous driving

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).