Miller v. CP Chemicals, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that employer satisfied third element because computer program was created to simplify plaintiffs job and eliminate errors, employer expressly asked plaintiff to continue to develop computer programs, and each computer program was tailored to defendant’s products
• finding, that employer satisfied second requirement because “the work was performed during the time period in which he was employed by CP”
• holding employer satisfied second element, even though employee “worked primarily, if not entirely, on the computer programs at his home on his own time” because “the work was performed during the time period in which he was employed by CP”
• although employee was not hired primarily to develop software, the development of computer programs was at least incidental to his job responsibilities because he was responsible for the organizing and updating of the laboratory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).