Skip to main content
· 7/30/2008

Miller v. Countrywide Bank, N.A.

Citations

  • 571 F. Supp. 2d 251
  • 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62547
  • 2008 WL 3522374

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the alleged facts gave rise to an inference of disparate impact “especially [] in light of the individual named plaintiffs’ allegations”
  • applying continuing violation doctrine to ECOA claim
  • discussing ambiguity in case law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gertner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.