Miller v. Consolidated Royalty Oil Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the former rule had been complied with when the test operator asked the observer whether the defendant “had done anything?”
• holding that the former rule had been complied with when the test operator asked the observer whether the defendant \had done anything?\
• observer’s negative answer when the testing officer asked him if the defendant had done anything was sufficient
• observer's negative answer when the testing officer asked him if the defendant had done anything was sufficient

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).