Miller v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in prosecution for seduction, prosecutor’s remark that no witness had contradicted testimony of two witnesses that accused had admitted sexual intercourse with prosecutrix was not proscribed comment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Washington v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1975-09-05· cited 59×
• Basham v. Terry, Administratrix
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1958-03-10· cited 42×
• Velocity Express Mid-Atlantic, Inc. v. Hugen
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 2003-09-12· cited 38×
• Hines v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1977-04-22· cited 29×
• Pollino v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2004-01-13· cited 21×
• Elliott v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1939-02-20· cited 18×
• Powell v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1937-01-14· cited 15×
• Johnson v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1988-09-23· cited 14×
• Street v. State
  Alabama Court of Appeals· 1957-08-13· cited 10×
• Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Chrisman
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1978-08-31· cited 7×
• Blair v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1936-06-11· cited 7×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Wills v. Russell
  Supreme Court· 1880-01-18· cited 45×
• Sutton v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1888-07-19· cited 31×
• State v. Brinkhaus
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1885-11-24· cited 20×
• People v. Kehoe
  California Supreme Court· 1898-12-31· cited 17×
• People v. Donahoe
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1917-06-21· cited 16×
• Sawyers v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1891-09-17· cited 15×
• People v. Donahoe
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1916-02-01· cited 4×
• People v. Clement
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1918-12-18· cited 2×