Miller v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Included in Petitioner’s brief to this Court are some statistical studies of the availability of such jobs. Petitioner did not introduce any of these studies into evidence at her hearing before the Board so we are precluded from considering them now.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Sanders v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-07-12· cited 22×
• Anam v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-02-17· cited 14×
• Kaminski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-03-18· cited 1×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Rodgers v. Commonwealth
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-09-12· cited 9×
• Zinman v. Commonwealth
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-04-25· cited 7×
• Faix v. Commonwealth, Department of Public Welfare
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-10-23· cited 5×
• Burwell v. Commonwealth
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-05-14· cited 4×
• Dorian v. Commonwealth, Department of Public Welfare
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-11-18· cited 1×