Skip to main content

Miller v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 513 S.E.2d 896
  • 29 Va. App. 625
  • 1999 Va. App. LEXIS 232

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a delay of about thirteen months between the filing of the detainer and the defendant’s trial was presumptively prejudicial and required further review
  • concluding that neither the Commonwealth’s communication to the police chief rather than the institutional facility nor the prisoner’s letter to the Commonwealth’s Attorney requesting disposition of the charges complied with the IAD
  • declining to weigh nine months of delay against state where the defendant was aware of her rights under the IAD but refused to exercise those rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bray

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.