· 5/5/1995
Miller v. Civil Constructors, Inc.
Citations
- 651 N.E.2d 239
- 272 Ill. App. 3d 263
- 209 Ill. Dec. 311
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- addressing issue raised in plaintiff’s brief even though “plaintiff’s counsel has failed to provide much in the way of legal authority or even persuasive legal analysis”
- addressing issue raised in plaintiff’s brief even though “plaintiff’s counsel has failed to provide much in the way of legal authority or even persuasive legal analysis”
- addressing issue raised in plaintiff’s brief even though “plaintiff’s counsel has failed to provide much in the way of legal authority or even persuasive legal analysis”
- discharge of firearms was not ultrahazardous activity such that target shooters were strictly liable for bystander’s injuries
- where the court stated that the use of firearms has been classified as highly dangerous but their use does not constitute an ultrahazardous activity
- discharge of firearms was not ultrahazardous activity such that target shooters were strictly liable for bystander's injuries
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bowman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.