Skip to main content
· 5/5/1995

Miller v. Civil Constructors, Inc.

Citations

  • 651 N.E.2d 239
  • 272 Ill. App. 3d 263
  • 209 Ill. Dec. 311

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • addressing issue raised in plaintiff’s brief even though “plaintiff’s counsel has failed to provide much in the way of legal authority or even persuasive legal analysis”
  • addressing issue raised in plaintiff’s brief even though “plaintiff’s counsel has failed to provide much in the way of legal authority or even persuasive legal analysis”
  • addressing issue raised in plaintiff’s brief even though “plaintiff’s counsel has failed to provide much in the way of legal authority or even persuasive legal analysis”
  • discharge of firearms was not ultrahazardous activity such that target shooters were strictly liable for bystander’s injuries
  • where the court stated that the use of firearms has been classified as highly dangerous but their use does not constitute an ultrahazardous activity
  • discharge of firearms was not ultrahazardous activity such that target shooters were strictly liable for bystander's injuries

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bowman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.