Skip to main content
· 2/10/1954

Miller v. Bureau of Unemployment Compensation

Citations

  • 160 Ohio St. (N.S.) 561

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remanding, for consideration in light of McNeely, factually similar case involving repeat-offender provision of implied-consent law
  • remanding the decision to admit into evidence of a mandatory blood draw back to the lower court 11 to be reconsidered in light of McNeely
  • remanding, for consideration in light of McNeely, factually similar case involving repeat-offender provision of implied-consent law
  • order vacating judgment and remanding case for reconsideration in light of McNeely
  • order vacating judgment and remanding case for reconsideration in light of McNeely

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hart, Lamneck, Middleton, Stewart, Tart, Weygandt, Zimmerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.