· 2/10/1954
Miller v. Bureau of Unemployment Compensation
Citations
- 160 Ohio St. (N.S.) 561
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- remanding, for consideration in light of McNeely, factually similar case involving repeat-offender provision of implied-consent law
- remanding the decision to admit into evidence of a mandatory blood draw back to the lower court 11 to be reconsidered in light of McNeely
- remanding, for consideration in light of McNeely, factually similar case involving repeat-offender provision of implied-consent law
- order vacating judgment and remanding case for reconsideration in light of McNeely
- order vacating judgment and remanding case for reconsideration in light of McNeely
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hart, Lamneck, Middleton, Stewart, Tart, Weygandt, Zimmerman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.