Skip to main content
· 4/23/1923

Miller v. Booth

Citations

  • 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 394

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the argument that the officers exceeded the scope of any consent was procedurally barred
  • noting that ammunition in plain view in a foyer was evidence supporting the defendant’s knowledge and constructive possession of firearms found elsewhere in the home
  • considering occupancy of premises where contraband is discovered as a factor in determining constructive possession
  • affirming conviction for possession of firearms by a convicted felon where defendant claimed firearms discovered in house he owned, and only sometimes lived in, belonged to adult son of defendant’s girlfriend

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chittenden

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.