· 4/23/1923
Miller v. Booth
Citations
- 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 394
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the argument that the officers exceeded the scope of any consent was procedurally barred
- noting that ammunition in plain view in a foyer was evidence supporting the defendant’s knowledge and constructive possession of firearms found elsewhere in the home
- considering occupancy of premises where contraband is discovered as a factor in determining constructive possession
- affirming conviction for possession of firearms by a convicted felon where defendant claimed firearms discovered in house he owned, and only sometimes lived in, belonged to adult son of defendant’s girlfriend
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Chittenden
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.