Miller v. Blue Ridge Glass Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “aftermarket purchasers” can have standing under Section 11 if they can trace their shares to the allegedly defective registration statement
• holding that “plaintiffs [must] plead as well as prove that their shares were issued pursuant to the misleading registration statement”
• affirming dismissal of Section 11 claims because any erroneous information in the prospectus “would not have misled the average investor in light of the accurate information in the prospectus.”
• negative revaluation of Q58 million for subprime and Q233 for Alt-A RMBS

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).