Skip to main content
· 5/12/2008

Miller v. Blacketter

Citations

  • 525 F.3d 890
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 10189
  • 2008 WL 2009748

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that 2 the defendant had “ample opportunity to arrange for an alternative to court- appointed counsel”
  • concluding denial of [Miller]’s motion to substitute counsel was not “the type of unreasoning and arbitrary insistence on expeditiousness that ... federal law prohibits”
  • concluding denial of Hamilton’s motion to substitute counsel was not “the type of unreasoning and arbitrary insistence on expeditiousness that .. . federal law prohibits”
  • denying habeas claim for deprivation of a petitioner’s right to choose his own counsel where the petitioner waited until the eve of trial to express dissatisfaction with his attorney
  • denying habeas claim for deprivation of a petitioner’s right to choose his own counsel where the petitioner waited until the eve of trial to express dissatisfaction with his attorney
  • reviewing district court's decision on merits when district court \expressly stated it would treat the claim as preserved and proceeded to assess the merits\ despite observing defendant \may have waived\ his right to counsel of choice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Scannlain, Graber, Callahan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.