Skip to main content
· 10/31/1996

Miller v. Bell

Citations

  • 83 Haw. 439
  • 927 P.2d 447
  • 1996 Haw. App. LEXIS 231

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • failing to appeal an RO decision within a one-year period renders the decision final
  • new and material evidence review limited to “those items added to the record after the previous final disallowance of appellant’s claim”
  • failure to timely appeal an RO decision within the one-year period renders the decision final
  • Court’s review for new and material evidence “is limited by statute to those items added to the record after the previous final disallowance of appellant’s claim”
  • failure to timely appeal an RO decision within one-year period renders the decision final
  • failure to appeal an RO decision within the one-year period renders the decision final

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.