Skip to main content
· 8/19/1976

Miller v. Bank of America

Citations

  • 418 F. Supp. 233
  • 13 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 439
  • 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13565
  • 13 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 11,357

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “essentially the isolated and unauthorized sex misconduct of one employee to another” not recognizable under title VII
  • \essentially the isolated and unauthorized sex misconduct of one employee to another\ not recognizable under title VII
  • in absence of specific factual allegations describing an employer policy, which in its application imposes or permits a consistent, as distinguished from an isolated, conditioning of employment on acquiescence in sexual advances, no Title VII claim stated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spencer Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.