Miller v. Auto-Alliance International, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relying on a “may result” standard, not Wickman’s “highly likely” or “substantially likely” standard
• in addition to relying on a “may result” standard, relying on “common knowledge and the current opprobrium in the media and legal system” as substitutes for actual evidence of probability of injury or death
• benefits paid “when [insurer] receive[s] notice and satisfactory proof of loss”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).