Miller v. Asensio

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding venue improper when based solely on the access within the forum of information that was posted on the defendants' passive website located outside the forum
• applying pendent venue doctrine as to state-law claims of fraud where the claims arose from the same nucleus of operative fact as the federal claim and venue was already established as proper as to federal claim
• applying pendent venue doctrine as to state-law claims of fraud where the claims arose from the same nucleus of operative fact as the federal claim and venue was already established as proper as to federal claim
• applying pendent venue doctrine as to state- law claims of fraud where the claims arose from the same nucleus of operative fact as the federal claim and venue was already established as proper as to federal claim
• applying pendent venue doctrine as to state- law claims of fraud where the claims arose from the same nucleus of operative fact as the federal claim and venue was already established as proper as to federal claim
• “[T]he website in this case is passive, rather than interactive, and thus should not support a finding that venue in this forum is proper.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).