Miller v. American Airlines, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that claims raised in federal court were not reasonably related to those raised in a EEOC charge in part because “the allegations in the plaintiffs’ EEOC charges were not enough to put American Airlines on notice” of the subsequent claims
• emphasizing need to “apply a liberal standard in determining if new claims are reasonably related”
• plaintiffs did not exhaust their remedies on a disparate treatment claim under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act where their EEOC charge stated that the plaintiffs were \subjected to different terms and conditions of employment\
• considering claim under Age Discrimination in Employment Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).