Miller v. Air New Zealand, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting motion to stay, reasoning that “the JPML is scheduled to hear Plaintiff’s motion on the next available date,” a mere 48 days from the court’s decision
• noting that courts “routinely” stay proceedings pending JPML rulings
• “Following Ivy, courts in this Circuit have exercised their discretion and deferred ruling on motions to remand in order to permit the MDL court selected by the JPML to decide such motions.”
• “Following Ivy, courts in this Circuit have exercised their discretion and deferred ruling on motions to remand in order to permit the MDL court selected by the JPML to decide such motions.”
• “Courts have determined that such short delays caused by staying proceedings until the JPML decides whether to transfer a case usually do not prejudice the plaintiff.”
• “In addition, courts in this Circuit have recognized that stays pending transfer will also conserve judicial resources, one of the fundamental goals of multidistrict litigation practice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).