Miller v. Abbott Laboratories

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding an upward adjustment based on several factually supported 24 factors to be proper under Daubert
• excluding the damages expert’s testimony about past licenses because the expert did very “little to describe these licenses” and the “jury could adequately evaluate the probative value of the agreements”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).