Skip to main content
· 4/11/1921

Miller & Lux, Inc. v. Sacramento & San Joaquin Drainage District

Citations

  • 256 U.S. 129
  • 41 S. Ct. 404
  • 65 L. Ed. 859
  • 1921 U.S. LEXIS 1700

Syllabus

<p>That particular lands included in a drainage district will receive no direct benefits is clearly not per se enough to. exempt them, under the Fourteenth Amendment, from assessment. P. 130. Houck v. Little River Drainage District, 239 U. S. 254.</p> <p>Writ of error to review 182 California, 252, dismissed; petition for a writ of eertiorari denied.</p>

Judges: McReynolds

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.