Skip to main content
· 12/21/1951

Miller Et Ux. v. Protrka Et Ux.

Citations

  • 238 P.2d 753
  • 193 Or. 585
  • 1951 Ore. LEXIS 315

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that purchasers did not justifiably rely on the statements of sellers where “the prospective buyers have or can obtain equal means of information” to discern their truth
  • alleged fraudulent misrepresentation in sale of motel
  • alleged fraudulent misrepresentation in sale of motel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brand, Hay, Bossman, Warner, Latotjrette

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.