Skip to main content
· 12/3/1928

Miller County Highway & Bridge District v. Standard Pipe Line Co.

Citations

  • 31 F.2d 1017
  • 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 3568

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying modification based on “an anticipated decline in [the father’s] income due to commercial fishing restrictions,” but noting that he could request modification again “if * * * the fishing restrictions do, in fact, result in a substantial reduction in his income in the future”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.