Skip to main content
· 12/11/1989

Miller Block Co. v. United States National Bank

Citations

  • 567 A.2d 695
  • 389 Pa. Super. 461
  • 1989 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3747

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that where the defendant listed sixteen defenses, and any one of the defenses would justify relief at trial, the meritorious defense prong was met
  • holding that, a trial court’s refusal to open a default judgment constitutes an abuse of discretion when the trial court fails to consider all prongs of the tripartite test and evaluate the equities involved in each of the three prongs
  • when letters were in writing, set a specific date and the parties agreed to the extension, writings conformed to Rule 237
  • “where there has not been strict compliance with the removal statute, or where the removal is subsequently determined to be invalid for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, proceedings in the state court between the filing of the removal petition and its denial are valid.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cavanaugh, Brosky, Rowley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.