Millender v. Herring

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relying on the other factors where there was no choice-of-law provision in the marine insurance contract
• analyzing the proposed intervenor’s interest in the action and the impairment of that interest pursuant to Rule 24(a)
• finding the intervening insurance company to have a sufficient interest in an action that would determine if its policy or the plaintiffs policy was “primary”
• granting intervention where the resolution of an action regarding a primary insurance provider would change the way in which the secondary insurance provider was situated with respect to the insured
• permitting intervention in declaratory judgment action of insurer who was “not making a claim under the policy, but [was] seeking to intervene in this Court’s determination of [other insurer’s] obligations because the scope of its own obligations may depend upon the outcome”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).