· 8/30/1988
Millen Industries, Inc. v. Coordination Council for North American Affairs
Citations
- 855 F.2d 879
- 272 U.S. App. D.C. 240
- 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 11875
- 1988 WL 88904
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that “an action is based upon the elements that prove the claim, no more and no less.”
- finding that “issuance of a license permitting the removal of uranium from Kazakhstan is a sovereign act”
- remanding because “[o]ne allegation of the complaint . . . may [have] be[en] sufficient to create jurisdiction” even as most were barred by FSIA
- “A useful inquiry ... is whether the essence or central elements of an agreement made by a foreign state might be made by a private person.”
- “Even if a transaction is partly commercial, jurisdiction will not obtain if the cause of action is based on a sovereign activity.”
- “Even if a transaction is partly commercial, jurisdiction will not obtain if the cause of action is based on a sovereign activity.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Buckley, Sentelle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.