Skip to main content
· 8/30/1988

Millen Industries, Inc. v. Coordination Council for North American Affairs

Citations

  • 855 F.2d 879
  • 272 U.S. App. D.C. 240
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 11875
  • 1988 WL 88904

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that “an action is based upon the elements that prove the claim, no more and no less.”
  • finding that “issuance of a license permitting the removal of uranium from Kazakhstan is a sovereign act”
  • remanding because “[o]ne allegation of the complaint . . . may [have] be[en] sufficient to create jurisdiction” even as most were barred by FSIA
  • “A useful inquiry ... is whether the essence or central elements of an agreement made by a foreign state might be made by a private person.”
  • “Even if a transaction is partly commercial, jurisdiction will not obtain if the cause of action is based on a sovereign activity.”
  • “Even if a transaction is partly commercial, jurisdiction will not obtain if the cause of action is based on a sovereign activity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Buckley, Sentelle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.