Millaudon v. Allard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \Fisher argues that the alleged Sixth Amendment violation in this case is structural error. But Fisher does not show why a claim for interference with counsel-rather than denial of counsel-should be subject to the harsh remedy of structural error.\ (Citation omitted.)
• “Fisher argues that the alleged Sixth Amendment violation in this case is structural error. But Fisher does not show why a claim for interference with counsel—rather than denial of counsel— should be subject to the harsh remedy of structural error.” (Citation omitted.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).