Skip to main content
· 5/1/1928

Millard v. Maxwell Motor Sales Corp.

Citations

  • 26 F.2d 212
  • 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 3638

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “due care would include those steps necessary to protect the public from a health or environmental threat”
  • explaining that “due care would include those steps necessary to protect the public from a health or environmental threat”
  • distinguishing A & N Cleaners based on defendant’s ownership during the period of violation
  • landowner failed to exercise “due care” where it remained passive “simply because public environmental authorities are addressing a hazardous waste situation”
  • landowner, who inquired into potential contamination before purchasing property, can invoke “innocent owner” defense under CERCLA to avoid liability for pollution caused solely by previous user of property
  • landowner failed to exercise “due care” where it remained passive “simply because public environmental authorities are addressing a hazardous waste situation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Booth, Munger, Sanborn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.