Millard v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that three forged checks presented to a bank teller at the same time constituted one offense of obtaining money by false pretenses
• noting that “multiple unlawful takings constitute separate larcenies if the thief acted upon a separate intent or impulse for each theft”
• noting that “multiple unlawful takings constitute separate larcenies if the thief acted upon a separate intent or impulse for each theft”
• noting that “multiple unlawful takings constitute separate larcenies if the thief acted upon a separate intent or impulse for each theft”
• extending the single larceny doctrine to the offense of obtaining money by false pretenses
• extending the single larceny doctrine to the offense of obtaining money by false pretenses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).