Millar v. Baldwin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The fact that plaintiffs are incarcerated and are proceeding pro se” does not warrant relief from the time limits imposed by Rule 4(a)
• bare notice of appeal not construed as motion for extension of time to appeal where no request for extension of time to appeal was manifest
• the language of the rule expressly requires the filing of a motion for extension of time; a bare notice of appeal cannot be construed as a motion for extension where no request for additional time is manifest
• the language of the rule expressly requires the filing of a motion for extension of time; a bare notice of appeal cannot be construed as a motion for extension where no request for additional time is manifest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).