Milisa Foster Galyeon, in and for Minor Child, I.J.G. v. Jason R. Moore and Cylisa N. Moore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plain meaning of a statute governs “[ajbsent clear and strong congressional intent to the contrary”
• holding that scienter is an element of Section 10(b), Rule 10b-5, and Section 17(a)(1), but not Section 17(a)(2) or (3)
• holding that scienter is an element of violations of § 78j and Rule 10b-5
• finding that scienter is a necessary element of every section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 claim
• holding scienter is not required under sections 17(a)(2) or (a)(3) of Securities Act of 1933, even though scienter is required for all claims brought under Rule 10b — 5
• involving an action by the Securities Exchange Commission rather than by a private individual

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).