· 5/16/1984
Milicevich v. Sacramento Medical Center
Citations
- 155 Cal. App. 3d 997
- 202 Cal. Rptr. 484
- 1984 Cal. App. LEXIS 2050
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognition that one or single satisfaction rule is designed to prevent double recovery
- “Whether there is in fact a double recovery cannot be determined 19 unless the damages which measure the full recovery for the injury have been litigated on their 20 merits.” (emphasis omitted)
- rec-ognition that one or single satisfaction rule is designed to prevent double recovery
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Blease
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.