Skip to main content
· 5/16/1984

Milicevich v. Sacramento Medical Center

Citations

  • 155 Cal. App. 3d 997
  • 202 Cal. Rptr. 484
  • 1984 Cal. App. LEXIS 2050

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognition that one or single satisfaction rule is designed to prevent double recovery
  • “Whether there is in fact a double recovery cannot be determined 19 unless the damages which measure the full recovery for the injury have been litigated on their 20 merits.” (emphasis omitted)
  • rec-ognition that one or single satisfaction rule is designed to prevent double recovery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Blease

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.