Milholland v. Sumner County Board of Education

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[t]he amended version of the ADA no longer requires the plaintiff bringing a claim under subpart (C) to show that the impairment limited her life activity” but holding that “the ADA Amendments Act does not apply to pre-amendment conduct” in that case
• “Congress enacted the ADA Amendments Act in order to ‘reinstat[e] a broad scope of protection to be available under the ADA.’” (quotation omitted)
• “That the defendants were aware of [an employee’s] health issues does not support a conclusion that they misperceived her physical abilities as impaired and affecting her performance.”
• “That the defendants were aware of [the plaintiffs] health issues does not support a conclusion that they misperceived [the plaintiffs] physical abilities as impaired and affecting [the plaintiffs] performance.”
• “That the defendants were aware of [the plaintiff’s] health issues does not support a conclusion that they misperceived [the plaintiff’s] physical abilities as impaired and affecting [the plaintiff’s] performance.”
• “The amended version of the ADA no longer requires the plaintiff bringing a claim under subpart (C) to show that the impairment limited her life activity, including working in a broad class of jobs.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).