· 3/2/2012
Milhauser v. Minco Products, Inc.
Citations
- 855 F. Supp. 2d 885
- 192 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3259
- 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27790
- 95 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,439
- 2012 WL 684007
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- insured who stayed at dwelling a few times a year did not reside there, and coverage for fire damage was barred under the “residence premises” provision
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ericksen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.