Skip to main content
· 3/2/2012

Milhauser v. Minco Products, Inc.

Citations

  • 855 F. Supp. 2d 885
  • 192 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3259
  • 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27790
  • 95 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,439
  • 2012 WL 684007

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • insured who stayed at dwelling a few times a year did not reside there, and coverage for fire damage was barred under the “residence premises” provision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ericksen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.