Milewski v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Section 1252(f)(1) does not bar vacatur because “a vacatur does nothing but re-establish the status quo absent the unlawful agency action[,]” and “vacatur neither compels nor restrains further agency decision-making”
• challenging Department of Homeland Security memoranda that established specific agency-wide procedures and created immediate measurable effects on immigration enforcement
• drawing a connection between “an increase in the number of aliens” and increased “education costs”
• stating that the arbitrary-and-capricious standard “has serious bite”
• “Apart from the constitutional or statutory basis on which [a] court invalidate[s] an agency action, vacatur neither compels nor restrains further agency decision-making.”
• “There are meaningful differences between an injunction, which is a drastic and extraordinary remedy, and vacatur, which is a less drastic remedy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).