Miles v. Waggoner
Citations
- 23 Pa. Super. 432
- 1903 Pa. Super. LEXIS 92
Syllabus
<p>Deed — Estoppel—Consideration—Parol evidence.</p> <p>The mere fact that the consideration named in a deed was natural love and affection and one dollar, is not in itself sufficient to estop the grantee from showing by parol evidence as against persons claiming title by a sheriff’s deed under a judgment against the insolvent grantor, that the real consideration was a money payment equal to the value of the land.</p>
Judges: Beaver, Henderson, Morrison, Orlady, Porter, Rice
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.