Skip to main content
· 10/5/1903

Miles v. Waggoner

Citations

  • 23 Pa. Super. 432
  • 1903 Pa. Super. LEXIS 92

Syllabus

<p>Deed — Estoppel—Consideration—Parol evidence.</p> <p>The mere fact that the consideration named in a deed was natural love and affection and one dollar, is not in itself sufficient to estop the grantee from showing by parol evidence as against persons claiming title by a sheriff’s deed under a judgment against the insolvent grantor, that the real consideration was a money payment equal to the value of the land.</p>

Judges: Beaver, Henderson, Morrison, Orlady, Porter, Rice

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.