Miles v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that although State’s argument was improper and inflammatory, conviction was affirmed because it probably did not affect the verdict
• closing argument that repeated objections were “unethical” was improper, but probably did not affect the verdict
• closing argument that repeated objections were \unethical\ was improper, but probably did not affect the verdict

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Oller v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1988-07-13· cited 76×
• Edwards v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1995-11-30· cited 32×
• Arevalo v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2002-07-11· cited 28×
• Faulkner v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1988-04-20· cited 6×
• Blasengame v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1988-01-25

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• Johnson v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1976-12-01· cited 743×
• Boyd v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1979-09-06· cited 83×
• Turner v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1979-09-04· cited 59×
• Hall v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1986-11-03· cited 42×