Miles v. RUBY TUESDAY, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suggesting, without deciding, that the First Amendment right of access may be applicable to judicial approval of an FLSA settlement agreement because it results in a final resolution of claims and thus is “akin to a summary judgment motion”
• “[G]iven the benefits of transparency in FLSA enforcement, courts should not abandon transparency simply because the parties are willing to do so.”
• “[E]ven where . . . all of the litigants support the motion to seal, and even where a public hearing on the question does not bring forth anyone to assert the right of access, a court must still engage in a careful deliberation on the issue.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).