Miles v. Ringo & Trapnall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an allegation of bias on the part of a panel member who may have influenced a consensus determination was supported by destruction of the individual members’ evaluation sheets
• noting that a protestor’s allegations of bias may “not rest merely on counsel’s argu ment; suspicion, or conjecture”
• noting that a protestor’s allegations of bias may “not rest merely on counsel’s argument, suspicion, or conjecture”
• allowing supplementation to reconstruct information contained in bid-proposal evaluations destroyed by the procuring agency’s contracting officer
• treating the government’s “proffer as a motion . . . to supplement the administrative record, and grant[ing] that motion”
• allowing supplementation to reconstruct information contained in bid-proposal evaluations destroyed by the procuring agency’s contracting 23 officer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).