Miles v. Miles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the modification was valid because “the trial court was merely modifying the QDRO to conform its terms so as to effectuate the expressed intent of the order.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ochoa v. Ochoa
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2002-04-09· cited 28×
• Farnsworth v. Farnsworth
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2003-07-08· cited 17×
• In Re Marriage of Green
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2011-05-03· cited 9×
• Roberts v. Roberts
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2014-06-03· cited 9×
• Royalty v. Royalty
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2008-09-30· cited 8×
• Ricketts v. Ricketts
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2003-08-26· cited 8×
• Bradley v. Bradley
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2006-06-30· cited 3×
• Brooks v. Brooks
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2003-10-14· cited 1×
• Lewit v. Lewit
  Superior Court of The Virgin Islands· 2009-09-09· cited 1×
• Deborah L Roberts v. Michael L Roberts
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2014-06-03

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State Ex Rel. Riordan v. Dierker
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1997-11-25· cited 45×
• In Re Marriage of Strassner
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1995-03-14· cited 34×
• Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Kansas City, Inc. v. Nixon
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2000-06-20· cited 18×
• Seal v. Raw
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1997-11-04· cited 13×
• Wells v. Wells
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1999-08-10· cited 6×