Miles v. His Creditors

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying New York law and seeing no \tension between an all sums allocation method and a finding that each asbestos claimant constitutes a separate occurrence\
• following Viking Pump in interpreting a defense provision that applies to specified \injury or damage covered under this policy ... but not covered under any underlying policy\
• accepting date of first exposure as event that triggers coverage and acknowledging -7- that New York law does not require diagnosis to trigger coverage for bodily injury from asbestos
• accepting date of first exposure as event that triggers coverage and acknowledging -7- that New York law does not require diagnosis to trigger coverage for bodily injury from asbestos
• accepting date of first exposure as event that triggers coverage and acknowledging -7- that New York law does not require diagnosis to trigger coverage for bodily injury from asbestos
• accepting date of first exposure as event that triggers coverage and acknowledging -7- that New York law does not require diagnosis to trigger coverage for bodily injury from asbestos

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).