Miles v. Chater

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the ALJ’s impartiality is “integral to the integrity of the system”
• explaining that “substantial evidence” is based on a “reasonable person” standard
• ordering remand to a different ALJ because of improper 14 statements implying that a particular doctor always found a disability “compromised” the 15 process
• stating a court “may not decide the facts anew, reweigh the evidence, or substitute [its] judgment for that of the Commissioner” but “must defer to the Commissioner’s decision if it is supported by substantial evidence”
• “If the Commissioner's decision is supported by substantial evidence we must affirm, even if the proof preponderates against it.”
• “If the Commissioner's decision is supported by substantial evidence we must affirm, even if the proof preponderates against it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).