Miles Laboratories, Inc. v. Department of Revenue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying § 381 immunity where salespeople maintained stock to replace damaged merchandise, serviced accounts, and arranged advertising displays
• denying § 381 immunity where salespeople maintained stock to replace damaged merchandise, serviced accounts, and arranged advertising displays
• setting up counter displays, etc., not “solicitation”; particularly noteworthy because Oregon’s tax scheme allowed domestic taxpayers to escape from taxation of income earned out of state in states where it failed the § 381 test
• setting up counter displays, etc., not \solicitation\; particularly noteworthy because Oregon's tax scheme allowed domestic taxpayers to escape from taxation of income earned out of state in states where it failed the § 381 test

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).