Milenkovic v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• evidence of prior sexual conduct not logically relevant; even if relevant, such evidence is unfairly prejudicial, hence no violation of fundamental rights in its exclusion
• necessity of sufficiently detailed offer of proof to permit the trial court to accept conclusion or inference urged
• “An offer of proof need not be syllogistically perfect but it ought to enable a reviewing court to act with reasonable confidence that the evidentiary hypothesis can be sustained and is not merely an enthusiastic advocate’s overstated assumption.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).