Skip to main content
· 2/22/2018

Mile Bluff Med. Ctr., Inc. v. Vill. of Necedah

Citations

  • 913 N.W.2d 515
  • 2018 WI App 21
  • 380 Wis. 2d 510

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that claimed invention included digital technology that was known to those skilled in the art at the time of the patent application
  • noting that the explanations contained in the written description can facilitate understanding the claim language
  • stating that a particular embodiment used in the specification to aid understanding should not import limitations into the claim
  • explaining that, prior to the teachings of the patent at issue, “viewers could not perform a search” of “television schedule information for upcoming programs”
  • noting that “[o]neway, two-way, three-way, and four-way valves are common”
  • guoting Tex. Digital Sys., Inc. v. Telegenix, Inc., 308 F.3d 1193, 1202 (Fed. - 4 - Cir. 2002

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.