Mildred Ives v. W. T. Grant Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the bona fide error defense in §1640(c) was unavailable despite creditor’s reliance, in selecting language for credit contract forms, on a pamphlet issued by the Federal Reserve Board
• concluding that the bona fide error defense in § 1640(c) was unavailable despite creditor’s reliance, in selecting language for credit contract forms, on a pamphlet issued by the Federal Reserve Board
• describing a security interest when there is none may violate the Connecticut truth in lending regulation patterned on Section 226.6(c)
• \Describing a security interest when there is none ... would constitute additional but misleading information.\
• “Describing a security interest when there is none ... would constitute additional but misleading information.”
• “only available for clerical errors”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).