Mildred Galvin v. Occupational Safety & Health Administration

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an FTCA claim against a federai agency as opposed to the United States must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction
• noting that an FTCA claim against a federal agency or employee instead of the United States must be dismissed
• holding □□□□□ is beyond dispute that the United States, and not the responsible agency or employee, is the proper party defendant in a Federal Tort Claims Act suit.”
• finding the exception applicable to failure to conduct OSHA inspection when statute and regulations authorize, but do not require, such inspections
• “[A]n FTCA claim against a federal agency or employee as opposed to the United States itself must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.”
• “Thus, an FTCA claim against a federal agency or employee as opposed to the United States itself must be dis- missed for want of jurisdiction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).