Mildenberger v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the Fifth Amendment ensures that the government does not appropriate private property for public use without just compensation
• holding plaintiffs’ subjective uncertainty about the taking’s permanency was not objectively justifiable
• outlining the history of the stabilization and justifiable uncertainty doctrines and recognizing their continued application after John R. Sandt& Gravel
• affirming summary judgment dismissing Fifth Amendment takings claim by riparian owner for water pollution
• affirming summary judgment dismissing Fifth Amendment takings claim by riparian owner for water pollution
• citing, e.g., Navajo Nation v. United States, 631 F.3d 1268, 1273–74 (Fed. Cir. 2011)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).